Presidential Power Unbound: A Comparative Look at Presidential Pardon Power
نویسندگان
چکیده
Though few scholars compare presidencies, a recent collection by John Carey and Matthew Shugart (1998) compares the use of the presidential executive decree power in several countries. In a similar vein, we examine the oft-neglected power of the presidential pardon in the United States and Russia. The power of presidents to grant pardons is typically unlimited, which fact alone makes it worthwhile to understand. Like Carey and Shugart, we look at the institutional factors involved in the potential and actual use of the pardon power in our attempt to explicate the foundations of and the constraints on presidential pardons, as well as any trends which may be evident in its use. The comparison highlights the difficulties in precisely defining “pardon,” as well as illustrating the fact that this seemingly minor power in a newer democracy can be used as a powerful political tool.
منابع مشابه
An Investigation of the Online Farsi Translation of Metadiscourse Markers in American Presidential Debates
The term metadiscourse rarely appears in translation studies despite the continuously growing body of research on discourse markers in different genres and through various perspectives. Translation as a product that needs to observe such markers for their communicative power and contribution to the overall coherence of a text within a context has not been satisfactorily studied. Motivated by su...
متن کاملPresidential pardon and mentally ill offenders detained in forensic hospitals.
The presidential pardon is a Brazilian tradition enacted every Christmas season by federal decree. An inheritance from Portuguese tradition, the Imperial pardon was incorporated into the first Brazilian constitution, of 1824, and remains a presidential prerogative according to the 1988 Federal Constitution. In 2008, this merciful regulation included, for the first time, mentally ill offenders d...
متن کاملThe Power of Omaha and Florida in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election
The United States, uniquely among all countries, elects its head of state using a two-tiered system called the Electoral College. If we view the states that make up the Electoral College as voters and make some simplifying assumptions, it is possible to use the theory of voting and voting power to measure the power of the individual states in a presidential election. Modeling the Electoral Coll...
متن کاملThe Legitimacy Puzzle in Latin America: Political Support and Democracy in Eight Nations. By John A. Booth and Mitchell A. Seligson. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 376p. $83.99 cloth, $24.99 paper
up to that fact that the Founders retained elements of monarchy and prerogative in the Constitution, to be invoked during crises (genuine or staged). Second, all three books essentially tell a top-down story about the power play between the three federal branches, but they barely discuss the institutional balance of power, which is itself a result of public opinion, and, in particular, the dist...
متن کاملAre All Presidents Created Equal? Presidential Powers and the Shadow of Presidential Elections
Presidential elections with few candidates held in temporal proximity to legislative elections are believed to promote the nationalization and consolidation of the legislative party system. However, contrary to the existing literature, we argue here that the shadow presidential elections cast over legislative elections is contingent upon the relative powers of the president vis-à-vis the legisl...
متن کامل